The Personal Branding Double Standard



who watches the watchmen

There is a double standard that has evolved in social media.

It is one where we have no problem using the space to call brands out on their shortcomings, yet it is taboo to question the people calling out the brands in a similar manner.

One group is looked at as protectors of the average consumer and the other is quickly labeled as trolls.

But is this fair or true?

While this is clearly a sensitive subject, aren’t these individuals subject to the same examination as the brands they critique?

The Person and The Personal Brand

When building a personal brand, someone is essentially splitting themselves in two. There is an individual that you may have met and even like, but who you probably don’t really know, then there is a brand that you are likely very familiar with and learned a lot from over the years.

While the two are deeply entwined, they are still separate entities and this often complicates things. It becomes difficult to tell if you are questioning one or the other. Even when you are honestly questioning the practices of a personal brand, you are intrinsically implicating the character of the person behind it. It is often not what is intended, but it is nearly impossible to avoid.

This Isn’t Anything New

The funny thing about this “personal branding” phenomena, it isn’t new.

Fashion brands, artists, craftsmen, retailers and jewelry designers (this is the world from which I hail) have been blending their name and their business for years. Yet they have reached a certain scale where we wouldn’t hesitate to criticize them. We manage to see companies like Donna Karin, David Yurman and Calvin Klein as entities and manage to marginalize the person at the center.

It seems fair to assume that we will soon arrive at a point where the same holds true for social media leaders. That we will inevitably get to a point where you can question the brand without questioning the character of the person.

Let’s Be Honest For A Second

If our company screwed up, you would not hesitate to rake us over the coals. Entire blogs and many a blog post are dedicated to the many missteps of brands. These days, there doesn’t even need to be a mistake.

Oftentimes, logical but poorly communicated changes are prone to kinds of emotional reactions we see all too often on the web. When this happens, we feel entitled to dissect these instances, regardless of how many people might work there.

Yet when it comes to a personal brand, especially the one-person businesses that have emerged out of social media, we just don’t seem to know the ground rules for disagreement.

So Where Do We Go From Here?

We need to figure out what it means when a name stands for both a person and a brand. The space is reaching a point where it becomes more and more challenging to separate the person from their ideas. This is especially difficult when you think about just how involved we’ve all become in watching these personal brands emerge and how emotional (regardless if we agree or disagree) we tend to get when things change.

So let me know what you think and try to avoid words like A-lister, hater or anything of the like. Let’s put the emotion to the side for a change and really try and talk about the realities of the criticism of a personal brand.

image: End Of The Line


Enjoy this post? Make sure you get the latest article delivered to you as soon as it's published by subscribing via RSS or Email (emails are usually sent out the morning after the post goes live). We respect your privacy and will never spam you.
About the author: Michael Schechter  (4 Posts)

Michael Schechter is the Digital Marketing Director for Honora Pearls, a company specializing in freshwater pearl jewelry. He also writes about all things digital over at his blog, and knows his way around a fine single malt scotch.


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Leon 141 pts

G'Day Michael,

You do raise some interesting issues. But I wonder If the personal/company branding question is mostly a reflection of three things:

* lots of bloggers know much less about marketing than they think they do

* lots of bloggers take themselves and what they do far too seriously

*some, if not lots of bloggers are more concerned with themselves than their customers.

I dunno! I'm only a consultant. I just sell stuff. It's a noble and honourable caling.

And I have a fair bit of fun too.

Regards

Leon

tonia_ries 117 pts

thanks for posting on such a thick topic, Michael. There's so much to this -- the reality is that we are all of us managing our personal brands online, and this is one of the skills that kids need to learn today. You're right, the more public you make your brand, the more you open yourself up to what can feel as a personal attack. But the reality is that we all have public brands now --it's just that we chose different degrees of sharing those brands with our professional brands, jobs or employers. (I like blogbregity 's notion of "shared social currency" that she outlines here http://therealtimereport.com/2011/11/07/how-to-use-content-curation-to-build-social-capital-for-yourself-and-your-business/). Where things get really tricky is when people lose sight of where the fine line is ...

My latest conversation: Klout Updates Privacy Features. Is it Enough?

MSchechter 626 pts

tonia_riesblogbregity It's one of those topics that I tend to lose my mind that we don't talk more about. The line is certainly fine, but I actually really like halffiction 's umpire rule. You can say it was a shitty call, but you can't say they are a shitty ump!

patrickallmond 10 pts

I just don't get how people have the time sit around and critique others - esp. in the world of blogging, online marketing, social meda - whatever you want to call it. It is useful time that can always be better spent escalating one's cause and company. I really don't give one rat's arse how and why [insert public figure's name here] got to where they are or what they are doing today. If they are doing something right that is making them more money and taking them where they want to go, kudos for them.

How appropriate that the follow update just posted from Facebook via Darren Hardy/Success magazine:

( https://www.facebook.com/DarrenHardyFan ).

"Daily Mojo: Unsuccessful people talk about other people. Successful people talk about ideas. Share with us: What will YOU talk about today?"

DannyBrown 2727 pts moderator

patrickallmond Or another way to look at it - if ideas aren't challenged, we simply resort to dictatorships and never moving forward. ;-)

My latest conversation: Forget Magic Beans - What You Really Need Are Balls and a Plan!

patrickallmond 10 pts

DannyBrown I agree Danny :) But I have to pick and choose what I care about and give my brainpower to. I don't care to put the 'debate energy' into blogging, social media, etc. I avoid politics and religion too because there are smarter people than me for that, and debates about politics and religion rarely end. I spend my time and fight for my company, primary school education (huge advocate, regular volunteer), aviation education, and showing small businesses how to get things done right on a shoestring budget. I'll have to trust people like you and Mike to keep the online marketing world in check :)

Confession: Every now and then I will comment on something that I find is ridiculous. But I do a lot of blog comment ranting, and then Ctrl-A Delete :)

DannyBrown 2727 pts moderator

patrickallmond Hi Patrick,

Oh, for sure, mate, and agree - there are usually a million other things that we (figuratively) could be speaking or writing about. And most of the times, I think that's the case.

But I think there are also times when people use their position to share something, or criticize, or offer tips, etc, that are clearly incorrect, lacking in substance or statistics, etc, and would harm a business if implemented.

Unfortunately, for want of a better word, some of these folks' words are taken as gospel - rightly or wrongly (like anyone else, the good and bad advice can intertwine). If unchallenged (hopefully professionally), then businesses and advisors/agencies to these businesses could suffer. And then no-one really wins then.

I think MSchechter 's bigger point is an interesting one. People will jump on the bandwagon and attack Ragu, or United Airlines. But try countering CC Chapman or Dave Carroll, who could be seen as a brand, and it's suddenly a different ball game. Which seems odd.

Hey ho. :)

My latest conversation: Forget Magic Beans - What You Really Need Are Balls and a Plan!

MSchechter 626 pts

patrickallmondDannyBrown Ahhh Ctrl-A Delete... something I know of, yet rarely use... need to get on that a bit more...

MSchechter 626 pts

patrickallmond Danny, did it kill you a little inside to find anything I say interesting?

Patrick, I think Danny summed it up nicely here. To really discuss the ideas completely, we need to be able to discuss the people who often state them. It'd be like trying to talk about a shortcoming of a brand without naming the brand. It isn't mature, its childish. It's a stunted conversation that leads to stunted results... We have to be respectful, but cant we just talk about what/who we are actually talking about?

patrickallmond 10 pts

MSchechterDannyBrown

Agreed on most points. But here is how a lot of these conversations going:

Blogger/Speaker A speaks to a audience who hangs on his/her every word. But the speaker misinforms the audience. They don't know they have been misinformed.

Smarter Person B also attends the same presentation (or watches the video, or reads the blog post from Speaker A) and writes a FB/Blog/TW critique of Blogger A. Then the very active people in SM/Blogging (which is not the same audience that Speaker A spoke to) get very involved in the topic. Sometimes even critiques of critiques come out. Hours are spent. And the rabbit hole gets deeper.

Challenge: The audience that was misinformed is not part of crowd that Smarter Person B speaks to. So a small fraction of the original audience gets the corrected information or sees the debate.

Does that mean the debate should not happen ? No. But the debate pretty much stays within the blogging/information marketing/social media clique; the same group that was probably smart enough to know the difference anyway. The audience member who walked away misinformed never sees the corrected information.

patrickallmond 10 pts

MSchechterDannyBrown I went back and read this, and I think I am getting a little offtrack from Mike's original point. Sorry about that.

MSchechter 626 pts

patrickallmond It may have strayed a bit, but it's very valid. Then again, I have to worry about people who go to a seminar once and take what they heard at face value (which is WAYYYY of topic, a very real problem).

MSchechter 626 pts

patrickallmondDannyBrown It may have strayed a bit, but it's very valid. Then again, I have to worry about people who go to a seminar once and take what they heard at face value (which is WAYYYY of topic, a very real problem).

MSchechter 626 pts

patrickallmond Fair enough, but so often, we tiptoe around the person whose ideas we want to build on or perhaps (gasp) even disagree with. So often all it takes is talking about someone to step over this insane line. But it's getting harder and harder to talk about ideas without talking about the people. And plenty of successful people talk about people... just because something is cliché doesn't make it true.

MSchechter 626 pts

patrickallmond Just a quick follow up. I get why you see this as unimportant, but I look at it differently. People are so powerful all the sudden and I don't think they fully grasp the impact of their actions. While I'm showing this through the lens of "what applies to brands should apply to personal brands", I also believe that if the rules were the same, people would be more measured in their (over)reactions to brands and that we would have less of this on both ends. More than anything, it just feels like the space has become a bit dirtier and this unwillingness to talk openly about people only tends to hold it back.

RobertDempsey 193 pts

As the current sole decision maker of my business I expect for people to disagree with my opinions. It happens on my blog where I openly invite debate of my ideas and what I post. I don't take it (too) personally and the conversations help us move ahead.

I hope that I am creating a community around my business where people aren't afraid to question my advice. I have as much if not more to learn than anyone else. As long as the debate is friendly, which most times it is, I'm up for it. But you'd better bring your A game.

I take the exact same attitude when "calling out" the actions of others as well as companies. I make my arguments for/against whatever they have done, and then open up the floor for conversation.

Blogs that are full of ass kissing for whoever is writing it - business or single person - aren't places I spend much time. And it's not the type of community I want around my business.

MSchechter 626 pts

RobertDempsey I'm with you. I hope you disagree with me. Better chance that I'll learn a thing or two. I'm probably wrong here, but I always prefer a lively debate to a friendly one (as long as you shake hands aftewards). The harder we push each other, the more we all stand to learn.

HowieSPM 2326 pts

I have been assaulting Guy Kawasaki today. Since the Fall of 2009 when Business Week included him in an article on paid tweeters and that he got $800 a tweet, I have been doing everything to mess up his personal brand over ethics. I won't ever visit AllTop even though Shonali was excited to get the badge for WUL. I refuse to acknowledge who Guy is. Which I am doing today because he was mentioned in the Beancast Podcast. So of course I tweeted 'Why would the beancast discuss an unknown?' 8)

I know people who have met Guy and like him as a person. To this day I will say that he is a nice person. But I attack the brand because I feel it i a bit fraudulent.

I think if you decide to build a personal brand you have to deal with this. Chris Brogan could of worked up the corporate latter to hopefully be CMO or started his own full service agency of Brogan Brogan and Rubenowitz. It is a two edged sword. You get freedom as a personal brand but you also have to accept that when your brand is attacked it is also your person.

MSchechter 626 pts

HowieSPM It's hard to see his brand as fraudulent because he is so damn open about it. He spoke at an industry event recently and while i was utterly turned off by his approach, I couldn't help but admire how honest he was about it...

Shonali 1242 pts

HowieSPM I'm going on the record (again? can't remember) to say that I like GK. I think he is, as MSchechter says, very open about his approach and a while back, when he realized that people didn't like his approach, he was really upfront about it. I've also heard him speak on webinars, etc., and he sent me a personalized copy of "Enchantment" when he heard how long it took me to get my Alltop badge. So, yes, I'm a GK fan. Not that it makes a difference to him, but...

It's interesting, this personal brand convo came up in #measurePR today. I'm not a branding expert and I'm kinda wondering if there is a difference between a "persona" and a "personal brand." Thoughts?

My latest conversation: Apple: A Case Study in Why Brands Should Control Their Stories

MSchechter 626 pts

ShonaliHowieSPM Haven't really split the hair between those two... The persona is probably more the approach you take to your brand where the entire personal brand also encapsulates the work that you do... that would be my BS off the top of my head answer :)

Shonali 1242 pts

MSchechter "BS off the top of my head answer." Haha! HowieSPM

My latest conversation: Apple: A Case Study in Why Brands Should Control Their Stories

halffiction 47 pts

It used to be that far fewer people had to make this type of consideration. There were public figures - actors, politicians, the rich and famous, athletes, etc. And then there were the rest of us. For the most part, celebrities knew what they were getting into when they entered public life. But now there's this grey area where people can become quite popular and have their ideas spread without the usual barrier to entry that fame usually had. And to a degree, many people are unprepared for this duality of having a public and private persona, what and what not to share, and what the consequences of getting it wrong are. Famous or not, we're all going to attract trolls, but the more popular you become, the more such attacks sting. I think the worse thing you can be is famous without being rich. At least when you're rich, you can go escape to a private island. But thanks to reality shows, blogging and other forms of "fame" - it's entirely possible to have the negative affects of being popular with few of the positive ones.

MSchechter 626 pts

halffiction Very true, but those people are still going after the attention. It isn't like it happened by accident. They chose to seek the spotlight and that spotlight comes with considerable downsides. The first part of the fame doesn't come with the fortune, but that is certainly the long term goal. And again, I'll ask, what is the difference between that and a small business? They are working their way through the same crowded space, but we rarely have any problem calling them out on shortcomings...

halffiction 47 pts

I'm going to sort of disagree (vs. strongly disagree) because I think that's mostly true, however sometimes we do things like start companies, communities, etc. without realizing that fame will be a result of our actions. I put up Adholes a lark testing out my friend's niche social networking software. It sat empty for three months as I was distracted by several other get rich quick schemes. Then, I decided to invite a few people and it spread very rapidly and within 6 weeks it was in the Wall Street Journal. Of course I thought Adholes was a good idea. But I had thought a lot of other things were and they went nowhere, so at this point I had absolutely no delusions that it would be any different! Within a year we had 10,000 members for me to babysit and listen to complaints and it really enveloped my life. There were certainly upsides to being that popular - and it definitely gave me credibility, and I'd never regret doing it but it is possible to become accidentally 'famous' in my opinion since I experienced it in a very very very modest sense myself.

MSchechter 626 pts

halffiction I see what you're saying, but (and I'm really not trying to be as much of a jerk as I'm about to sound like) to a certain extent it sounds like you were going after the idea of get rich quick without ever really being prepared for or believing in the possibility of success.

I expect that my blog is going to flounder, but if all the sudden it became successful and there was crap I had to deal with, I can't help but fell that I asked for it.

halffiction 47 pts

MSchechter No no you're totally right about that part - not expecting success was totally on me. OK - I'll try to give you a better example - Now tell me the Bedroom Intruder Song guy (who was taken from a news broadcast and autotuned by someone else, becoming an Internet sensation) isn't the perfect example of an accidental celebrity. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMtZfW2z9dw

MSchechter 626 pts

halffiction We are SO about to devolve into semantics here, but since we mostly agree with one another, why not :) I don't think they expected the success, but they certainly wanted it. That video took a ton of time and creativity to make and the chose to publish it. The intent was to be seen.

It's like buying a lotto ticket, you sure as hell don't really expect to win, but there's still a chance...

halffiction 47 pts

MSchechter Not to split hairs but the guys who made the video had a successful Internet show called AutoTune the News and made an unwitting crime victim a huge "singing" success - so I'm talking about his part in the fame.

MSchechter 626 pts

halffiction Sorry, I misunderstood. You definitely have a point there, but we managed to wander pretty far away from the main point :)

juliepippert 37 pts

"That we will inevitably get to a point where you can question the brand without questioning the character of the person." I guess it depends upon which pond you are in. I've seen equally vociferous attacks and defense of brands, including personal ones. Again, the leaders in the different ponds of social media really vary as does the culture. Good discussion is always about the concept and both sides need to know and stick to that -- well said.

MSchechter 626 pts

juliepippert Thanks and I completely agree on focusing in on the concept. The problem kicks in when you have to tiptoe around the personal issues, it occasionally becomes awkward to say what you want to say. You have to be respectful, but you have to be able to challenge what someone says. You have to punk the idea, but you need to be able to acknowledge the person.

danieleagee 94 pts

People who attack brands are usually people not doing enough real work.Right? Right.Said the man who wrote a post destroying Klout last week.

halffiction 47 pts

danieleagee In defense of brands, it's not easy to have a "the customer is always right" stance in social media. I don't envy people who work at brands and have to deal with upset customers in a public forum. Of course, there are always brands where this is enjoyable to watch unfold. The worst case is when brands act on Twitter like they really care, tell you to email them and then give you the same ridiculously bad customer service you're used to in other forms of media.

MSchechter 626 pts

halffictiondanieleagee I spend the bulk of my day helping our customers both in public forums and private ones. Most of the time, as long as we try, they understand. Sure, some will expect the universe, but they are going to be disappointed no matter what we do. We do our best to do right by them and if and when an interaction blows up in our face, we will face it.

Having a twitter account doesn't make you any better at customer service, only giving a crap and going reasonably over and above reasonable does.

halffiction 47 pts

MSchechterdanieleagee Hopefully your great customer service is not pearls before swine (jk).

MSchechter 626 pts

halffictiondanieleagee well played :) All kidding aside, we've put a lot of time and thought into the behind the scenes CS part than we have the public social part. It's where all of the truly important conversations happen and fuels how your customers feel about you. I often find that brands on Twitter are overly focused on being responsive and underemphasize actually, you know... helping...

danieleagee 94 pts

halffiction I guess that's my point. People are thinking that Social Media is it's branch in your organization, but it's not. It's just a tool that helps you do your job better. Whether that be marketing or customer service, it's just a connection tool. If you treat your customers like shit in private, it'll happen in public too.

MSchechter 626 pts

danieleageehalffiction Couldn't agree more. Social Media is just the front end.

MSchechter 626 pts

danieleagee Nah, most of them are doing plenty of work and just want to call out the things that bother them. I just get annoyed when it is inappropriate to turn the mirror around.

danieleagee 94 pts

MSchechter I guess my big deal is I don't give a shit about Ragu having a bad campaign focusing on moms instead of fathers. What's the point of being such a tool that you buy the domain FUragu and run with it for a month? Are you kidding me? Seriously? That's the best use of your time? Not pouring 20 hours into a charity? Helping consult with a non-profit? Nope. Fuck you Ragu; that's the best idea.

I know my last post was about how Klout sucks; but ripping a brand a new one for selling a minor's information vs. ripping a brand a new one because they had an insensitive campaign? Seriously?

MSchechter 626 pts

danieleagee I think you know we agree there :) I also didn't see your Klout post in the same vein. Sure at one point you railed against it being crap, but even there you held back. I enjoyed your post because it was primarily an analytical look at what in theory could easily become an emotional topic. And I can't help but also agree that selling a minors info is a bit more of a major ordeal...

RobertDempsey 193 pts

danieleageeMSchechter I managed to write my 2 2k+ word Klout posts and not skip a beat with work for my clients. Sounds like some more coffee is in order for some folks. But you aren't getting mine!

Tinu 364 pts

For myself, I've decided that the rules are, there aren't any different rules, not for this. Because my standard rule is to go about my disagreements without being disagreeable, I rarely come out in public against a personal or company brand with emotion. Typically I'll wait until I have had time to think the matter over and present my thoughts in a way where, at minimum, if those thoughts were directed at me, I would listen. If you can't take criticism, you shouldn't be making the conscious decision to be in the spotlight. Period.

When I first started my business, I realized the only way I was going to improve, as a one person shop back then was if I accepted critique. So I made some ground rules (no name calling or cussing, stay on issue) and opened my business to critique, and printed the most helpful ones - regardless of pain level - in my newsletter, with thanks. I'm human and there are exceptions to when I get riled up in public and attack a brand. I have one directed at Netflix on my personal blog - but even that one I wrote up after going through every proper channel I could find and getting nowhere. Even then the harshest thing I said was that there service was "shitty". So, with the golden/platinum rule in mind, I don't make differentiations between the way I address personal or company brands any more. I just try to treat both with the demeanor I'd listen to - since the end result is to be heard and listened to, not to having the wittiest, meanest comment.

My latest conversation: Conversation @ http://www.freetraffictip.com/tool-time-friday-echofon-for-twitter.php/echofon-for-twitter

MSchechter 626 pts

Tinu First of all, cussing... awesome! More importantly, most of what I see people getting offended by isn't name calling (although there is plenty of the troll/guru crap). It's people simply being offended because you are talking about them by name.

Maybe I'm weird (ok, I'm weird), but there is a big difference between saying someones service is shitty and saying they are. I don't think you are questioning Reed Hastings there, simply the overall processes of a brand. And if they are shitty, you aren't doing them any favor by pulling a punch.

halffiction 47 pts

MSchechterTinu Yep, in baseball you can tell the umpire "that's a shitty call" and you're fine. If you say "you're a shitty umpire" that's when you get ejected from the game.

MSchechter 626 pts

halffictionTinu The umpire rule... I like that :)

AnneWeiskopf 41 pts

Oh thank God. Guru wasn't on your list. I can breathe now. Hope folks heed your recommendations.

MSchechter 626 pts

AnneWeiskopf It may as well be, it's one of those words we all tend to throw out when we want to dismiss someone. All of these crap words just lead to crappier conversations...

Conversation from Twitter

DmitryDi
DmitryDi

dannybrown PunkViews Бренд ДА, в Росии согласованный с Роспотребнадзором?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] though, can come in many forms. There’s the type of fame that Mike talked about; but that’s where we seek fame but don’t really say as much. Then there’s the [...]

  2. [...] The Personal Branding Double Standard – Social media can be both beautiful and ugly at the same time, and not in a Coyote ugly kind of way. Perhaps the most common area where we see this two-headed beast is when it comes to the personal brand. Sure folks like to establish them, but often cannot act civilly when someone questions their brand. Many will challenge established brand, but when their “brand” is questioned, the civility goes out the window. Speaking of windows some should remember that those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones or get undressed. [...]

  3. [...] though, can come in many forms. There’s the type of fame that Mike talked about; but that’s where we seek fame but don’t really say as much. Then there’s the well-deserved [...]