The Pageantry of Pundits



nowhere beauty contest
Image by ActiveFree

The commercialization of the social web by advertising-hungry blogging companies, personal branders, and rank amateurs disguised as marketers has produced a pageant of pundits. Whoever is most popular wins the Mr. or Mrs. Social Media contest.

In the current attention economy, people value peer opinion over facts, research, results and even common sense. Social media pundits – people who voice the “expert opinion –wax poetic on the best way to Pin, market selflessly, garner ROI online, avoid garnering ROI online, on and on.

Their blog posts and content increasingly read like thinly veiled forms of link bait, creating an RSS stream of “look-good” pieces that do little to inform the public or further evolve the sector.

Rather, they trick readers to validate the authors through social shares, comments, and an overarching public perception of “thought leadership.” Yet, the deeper you dig, the less research, analysis, results, original thought and experiences you find. Only hyperbole.

It’s only a matter of time before Big Data becomes accessible to individual voices and small companies marketing themselves like this. Then their fake plastic content can evolve to a level of pandering heretofore reserved for political pollsters. As soon as the social web winds shift, they can move from Google+ books to Pinterest webinars, and damn the rest.

Who loses?

Society certainly becomes less thoughtful and poorly informed. It’s not like the media can vet these arguments intelligently. In some cases, the press only amplifies the bad memes developed for the attention economy.

Our industry invariably gets dragged down as the larger business world becomes more suspicious of social media and marketing pundits. And yes, the pundits themselves lose respect, at least amongst their professional peers who are experienced enough to discern fact from fiction.

The rewards – at least short term – still sway the pundit. To be loved, to be considered a thinker, to be lauded in print and YouTube video. He’s (she’s) a SxSW hero!

What more can anyone ask for? Isn’t this what we’re supposed to do? Become popular and famous?

Real mainstream discourse is a joke. Long live the pageant!


Enjoy this post? Make sure you get the latest article delivered to you as soon as it's published by subscribing via RSS or Email (emails are usually sent out the morning after the post goes live). We respect your privacy and will never spam you.
About the author: Geoff Livingston (2 Posts)

Geoff Livingston provides superior communication consulting, training, and strategy to help mindful companies and nonprofits dedicated to social change. He has worked as a public relations strategist in the Washington, D.C. region for more than 18 years. He is author of the books Now Is Gone and Welcome to the Fifth Estate, and the upcoming book Marketing in the Round, co-authored with Gini Dietrich.


88 comments
geoffliving
geoffliving

@lisagerber @punkviews Thanks for the RT, Lisa.

geoffliving
geoffliving

@lisagerber @punkviews Thanks for the RT, Lisa.

ian.altman
ian.altman

I'm puzzled. What was the point of the original post? When you complain about other people making money or being recognized as a thought leader, it sounds like sour grapes. I'm sure you have plenty of great ideas an experience to share with people. But, the couple of times I have read anything you have written then content was filled with whining about somebody else.

 

I don't know of many event organizers wondering "where can I find someone really negative." In your "about the author" box and in other venues you have bragged about your credentials and expertise. If you happen to share any such pearls of wisdom, your value would grow dramatically. Of course, as I have mentioned before, being an expert is like being good looking - It's only OK if others describe you that way. If you call YOURSELF an expert, then you sound like a jerk.  I don't know if reading this article would inspire one of my clients to hire you as a "public relations strategist."  But, you know your audience.

 

I look forward to someday reading something positive from you.  I'll check back periodically with wishful thinking.

geoffliving
geoffliving

 @ian.altman I can see why you would say that. But seven years into this stuff, my experience is my experience.  Feel free to read my regular blog if you are looking for more industry data that offers less introspective commentary in nature. geofflivingston.com, For nonprofit information, please read social.razoo,com.

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

 @ian.altman Hi Ian,

 

While I'll let Geoff reply to your main comment, in fairness many of his posts on his own blog shine the light on the great work others are doing, as does his posts on the blogs of the non-profit orgs he's either consulted with or worked with.

 

The theme of this blog in general is to question the status quo and the faux expertise being doled out in the name of "it's not about me", when clearly it is. To that end, the tone of this post fits that premise perfectly.

 

Hope that helps, mate, and thanks for the comment.

ian.altman
ian.altman like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @DannyBrown Danny - thank you for the quick response and clarification. Perhaps I'm just not that cynical (yet). 

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

 @ian.altman Ha, no worries mate. I think we all have cynicism just waiting to come out, and I know I'm a very different "inhabitant" of the social media space than I was just a short year or so ago.

 

I do feel the good still outweighs the bad, for the majority - it just seems that sometimes the bad can be so visual, it's harder to ignore.

 

Cheers again, sir!

ian.altman
ian.altman

I'm puzzled. What was the point of the original post? When you complain about other people making money or being recognized as a thought leader, it sounds like sour grapes. I'm sure you have plenty of great ideas an experience to share with people. But, the couple of times I have read anything you have written then content was filled with whining about somebody else.   I don't know of many event organizers wondering "where can I find someone really negative." In your "about the author" box and in other venues you have bragged about your credentials and expertise. If you happen to share any such pearls of wisdom, your value would grow dramatically. Of course, as I have mentioned before, being an expert is like being good looking - It's only OK if others describe you that way. If you call YOURSELF an expert, then you sound like a jerk.  I don't know if reading this article would inspire one of my clients to hire you as a "public relations strategist."  But, you know your audience.   I look forward to someday reading something positive from you.  I'll check back periodically with wishful thinking.

geoffliving
geoffliving

 @ian.altman I can see why you would say that. But seven years into this stuff, my experience is my experience.  Feel free to read my regular blog if you are looking for more industry data that offers less introspective commentary in nature. geofflivingston.com, For nonprofit information, please read social.razoo,com.

DannyBrown
DannyBrown

 @ian.altman Hi Ian,   While I'll let Geoff reply to your main comment, in fairness many of his posts on his own blog shine the light on the great work others are doing, as does his posts on the blogs of the non-profit orgs he's either consulted with or worked with.   The theme of this blog in general is to question the status quo and the faux expertise being doled out in the name of "it's not about me", when clearly it is. To that end, the tone of this post fits that premise perfectly.   Hope that helps, mate, and thanks for the comment.

ian.altman
ian.altman

 @DannyBrown Danny - thank you for the quick response and clarification. Perhaps I'm just not that cynical (yet). 

DannyBrown
DannyBrown

 @ian.altman Ha, no worries mate. I think we all have cynicism just waiting to come out, and I know I'm a very different "inhabitant" of the social media space than I was just a short year or so ago.   I do feel the good still outweighs the bad, for the majority - it just seems that sometimes the bad can be so visual, it's harder to ignore.   Cheers again, sir!

guhmshoo
guhmshoo like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

Unbelievable. You talk about social media pundits and not once did you mention my name.

guhmshoo
guhmshoo

Unbelievable. You talk about social media pundits and not once did you mention my name.

geoffliving
geoffliving

 @guhmshoo LOL, that's because you are an artiste!

AskAaronLee
AskAaronLee

@Rhysorwin I just opened the link, but i'll read it tomorrow. Off to bed now. Take care mate. Cheers @PunkViews

Rhysorwin
Rhysorwin

@AskAaronLee No worries buddy, it would be cool to have a chat soon. It has been a while!

AskAaronLee
AskAaronLee

@Rhysorwin No, if you divide it by "half" Hint: 80mph hahaha! cheers mate.

AskAaronLee
AskAaronLee

@Rhysorwin I just opened the link, but i'll read it tomorrow. Off to bed now. Take care mate. Cheers @PunkViews

Rhysorwin
Rhysorwin

@AskAaronLee No worries buddy, it would be cool to have a chat soon. It has been a while!

AskAaronLee
AskAaronLee

@Rhysorwin No, if you divide it by "half" Hint: 80mph hahaha! cheers mate.

GiseleNMendez
GiseleNMendez

@rhysorwin @PunkViews @SocMediaRebel Thanks for sharing, Rhys! Damned neverending popularity contests + social media pundits + poor content

GiseleNMendez
GiseleNMendez

@rhysorwin @PunkViews @SocMediaRebel Thanks for sharing, Rhys! Damned neverending popularity contests + social media pundits + poor content

AmyMccTobin
AmyMccTobin like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 5 Like

Just when I thought Punk Views was dying on the vine, BAM!  It's back in full force.  20 years ago or more I read a book by Allen Bloom called The Closing of the American Mind.  Sadly, I think we have become so lazy we don't want to think for ourselves.

 

As an opinionated woman, I often piss lazy thinkers off.

Howie Goldfarb
Howie Goldfarb like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @AmyMccTobin Amy did you know that someone makes a call to a business from the Yelp! App every other second? That is ridiculously impressive. @geoffliving throws that around all the time to impress people with his factual knowledge.

 

Did you know that comes out to 86 calls made per day per US state. LOL

AmyMccTobin
AmyMccTobin

Just when I thought Punk Views was dying on the vine, BAM!  It's back in full force.  20 years ago or more I read a book by Allen Bloom called The Closing of the American Mind.  Sadly, I think we have become so lazy we don't want to think for ourselves.   As an opinionated woman, I often piss lazy thinkers off.

HowieSPM
HowieSPM

 @AmyMccTobin Amy did you know that someone makes a call to a business from the Yelp! App every other second? That is ridiculously impressive. @geoffliving throws that around all the time to impress people with his factual knowledge.   Did you know that comes out to 86 calls made per day per US state. LOL

DannyBrown
DannyBrown

 @HowieSPM  @AmyMccTobin  @geoffliving Howie, please state the correct facts - it's Android users that make up this number, as iPhone users are too busy trying to chat up Siri with their Angry Birds high scores.

AmyMccTobin
AmyMccTobin

 @HowieSPM  @geoffliving You see, THIS is what I miss when Punk Views goes quiet - all of the piss taking.  Cmon @DannyBrown , go smack danieleagee upside the head and get some content rolling out of here regularly.

DannyBrown
DannyBrown

 @AmyMccTobin  @HowieSPM  @geoffliving  I've tried with Daniel Agee , truly I have... ;-)

geoffliving
geoffliving

 @AmyMccTobin LOL.  Glad you enjoyed the post. Now piss off (in a loving way).

Marcus_Sheridan
Marcus_Sheridan like.author.displayName 1 Like

Geoff, a few months ago you announced a newer, more positive Geoff. I'm guessing you've changed your mind?

Howie Goldfarb
Howie Goldfarb like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @Marcus_Sheridan This I am pretty sure comes from two recent experiences of mine to top off months of BS. When a Social Media rockstar who writes books and makes 7 figures (I think) and has hundreds of thousands of twitter followers says the reason it is ok to publish a flawed infographic with bad data says 'It's Ok I am a marketer we all lie'

 

There you go.

geoffliving
geoffliving

@Marcus_Sheridan No, Marcus. I just committed to mot calling anyone out by name or with a direct link. Stick to the writing in black print.

Marcus_Sheridan
Marcus_Sheridan

 @geoffliving  What's the difference between not calling someone out versus just coming out and stating their name? To me, it's the same thing. In fact, I think mentioning the person's name if it's an obvious reference like this one was is the proper thing to do.

 

I know people that have read @chrisbrogan 's book about G+ and benefited greatly. I'm one of them. Just because you don't like a blogger, or "expert", doesn't mean that person isn't affecting lives in a positive way.

 

Let me ask you Geoff, and I'd love to know your honest answer, being that we both agree transparency is heavily lacking in our society---

 

Would you consider me to fall into any of the negative categories above?

 

Your honest won't hurt my feelings  (not that I think you'd filter regardless), I'm just trying to understand who you classify as a fake and who you don't.

geoffliving
geoffliving

 @Marcus_Sheridan If that's the baseline to go home today, then we can agree on that. May you see beauty wherever you go.

Marcus_Sheridan
Marcus_Sheridan

 @geoffliving Geoff, it appears you and I aren't going to agree on anything here, as we obviously have a very different way of seeing things, and that's OK.

 

When all is said and done, you're going home to your beautiful daughter and I'm doing the same with my little ones, which is ultimately what really matters-- that much I'm sure we can agree on.

geoffliving
geoffliving

 @Marcus_Sheridan I'm sorry, but you're wrong. I have seen your posts directly referencing people and brands, and I take them to be attacking in style.  When you attack people or reference people's faults in such a way without having the facts, and blatantly stating an opinion, you harm the other person. I don't really care what your reason or motive is, whether it's to garner attention, make "a point," look good, be right, state an opinion, or whatever, you are hurting people.  It's marketing, not Syria.

 

 

Finally, Marcus, calling or not calling people out has nothing to do with manhood, it has everything to do with understanding how your words impact others. A real man doesn't piss on someone's shoes just because he can. The mark of  a real man is that he can demonstrate control instead of acting like a teenage boy.

Marcus_Sheridan
Marcus_Sheridan

 @geoffliving I spend the majority of my time complimenting good people and good works Geoff. I attack principles and practices and ideas, not people. If I disagree with a principle, and it comes directly from a person, I think I should be man enough to say who that person is. And whenever I mention a person to reference a principle I disagree with, I make sure to point out all their good as well, but then state why I don't fall in line with a particular idea. You'll see this with every single person I've ever mentioned on my blog.

 

And by the way, me stating my opinion on something, and being willing to talk about it, is supposed to be what blogging and conversation is all about. Just because you and I disagree so much doesn't mean that I'm hurting the conversation. Furthermore, based on what you've said yourself a million times, one would think you'd welcome the idea that someone disagreed with a "social media expert" like yourself.

geoffliving
geoffliving

 @Marcus_Sheridan No, you are assuming anger and assuming that I have lumped you into a group.

 

I responded vehemently to your challenge about transparency and linking.   I used the word fuck. Fuck transparency! That's because I strongly disagree with you about calling people out.

 

Again, stick to the black print, Marcus. Dramatic red herrings don't help the conversation.

 

Since you brought up your blog, I have seen you call out several people and know you think differently. I also think you will regret doing this at a later date, based on my experience. 

Howie Goldfarb
Howie Goldfarb

 @Marcus_Sheridan I agree with you Marcus. In fact using baseball as a great metaphor if you are a batter and fail only 70% of the time you will make the Hall of Fame.

Marcus_Sheridan
Marcus_Sheridan like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @HowieSPM  Hey bud. I agree that dishonesty is a bad thing, especially if it's intentional. I also think people make mistakes though, and just because someone has a few mistakes or issues doesn't mean we should erase their entire body of good works.

 

 

Howie Goldfarb
Howie Goldfarb like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @Marcus_Sheridan  @geoffliving well now you know who said it is ok to post infographics that have bad data Marcus. Because marketers lie. That is what he said. Do you trust the book you read now?

 

There was another last week from someone else on Twitter. It said 175 mil tweets per day and 33bil tweets per day. I called out the blog author on how they can publish the faulty infographic and he said 'well I mention in my post the link to the source'

 

I have been fighting the deceptions for social media for 3 years now how numbers get inflated or spun on a whim. Facebook used to have on their stats page 55mins per day per user time spent. When it dropped into the 20's they switched to 700bil minutes a month (which was at the time 28mins a day). Now they took the stat down because they ran out of ways to spin the data in their favor. marketers do this all the time. Welcome to my world. It sucks.

 

You have a very high level of honesty and ethics on your blog. And it is refreshing. Both you and I were not raised in the world of marketing. It is an asset trust me.

Marcus_Sheridan
Marcus_Sheridan

 @geoffliving "So maybe by your rules I'm a crappy SME"...There you go again Geoff. I respond to 95% of comments on my blog. Yet I follow less than 10% of the people that follow me and don't respond to many tweets in general because of time. Is this the right or wrong way? No, it's just my way.

 

But it appears you've automatically lumped me into to this mystical group that causes you so much anger, frustration, or whatever that is I read above.

 

I'm the last person to say there is a set "rule" for anything. If someone wants to follow everyone back, that's their thing. If someone wants to follow no one back, that's their thing.The examples go on and on Geoff.

 

I guess this just comes down to a "half empty", "half full" conversation about the social media world, and I'll happily admit I'm going to see it half full and recognize there is wayyyy more good than bad out there.

geoffliving
geoffliving like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @Marcus_Sheridan We don't play by the same rules, and that's clear. I'm OK with that. For me, calling someone out publicly or with a direct link is a clear spiritual transgression that harms someone directly. As a result of that, I now discuss issues in a general way.

 

If you think that's a transparency violation, well then fuck transparency. It's not worth it.  I also don't respond to every tweet and comment, and I don't follow everyone back. so maybe by your rules I'm a crappy social media expert.  Works for me. Again, those are not my rules. 

 

Just because someone has one rule or way doesn't mean its an absolute truth. Just because I presented this view -- this punk view -- doesn't mean its the only one. Far from it.

 

Have a nice day, Marcus.